I have written before about the large numbers of Bible-believing
Christians who are advocating against any governmental control (link here) of guns. Anyone standing outside the walls of the fundamentalist community might find it
strange that people who strongly profess to have a loving God (Jesus) would
also strongly profess their governmental right to kill people with very
powerful weapons.
I have watched this debate with some interest—scanning the
talking heads out there for any evidence that SOMEONE in the Bible-believing community
finds the whole gun rights argument to be outside the purview of religion. I
have not yet found anyone, although I am sure that they exist. However, I did hear of a Christian pastor who gave
a reason why the fundamentalist community is so strongly in favor of killing
people with very strong weapons.
This pastor said, “The biblical basis for this is the Golden
Rule.” He then continued; “Do unto other what you would have done unto you.”
I was momentarily taken aback. I do not want someone to
murder me, how could I then go out and murder someone? Surely this was not what that
pastor meant.
That pastor was talking about protecting other people. The fundamentalist Christian community uses The Golden Rule as their reason for being “The Great Protector.” They want the right to carry powerful weapons because
they feel that no one else is going to protect them.
This may be a philosophy, but it’s not a good religious
philosophy. In fact, using the Golden Rule as the basis for killing people with
very powerful weapons is the ANTITHESIS of good religious philosophy. Let me
state this more clearly.
One of the passages in the Hebrew Bible which gives
Christians the foundation for their Golden Rule is Leviticus 19:18—“…thou
shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.”
Do unto others is related to loving other people as yourself. This makes sense. But there is nothing in Leviticus 19:18 about using powerful weapons to kill people. Nothing.
Leviticus 19:18 has a sentence before "thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. This sentence is even more strongly against using powerful weapons to protect oneself. The first part of the verse in
Leviticus 19:18 is as follows: “Thou shalt not take vengeance, nor bear any
grudge against the children of thy people.” The verse also has a stunning
ending: “I am the L-RD.” Thus, Leviticus 19:18 isn’t just any verse for a
Bible-believing Christian. Leviticus 19:18 is a verse in which we listen to the
word of G-d. This makes Leviticus 19:18 a very important verse for the
Bible-believing Christian community.
Here it is in its entirety:
Thou shalt not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. I am the L-rd.
***
This brings us to a very big difference between The Golden Rule and Leviticus 19:18. One uses the word "other" while the latter uses the word "neighbor."
Is there a meaning of the word “other” which would lend
credence to the Christian perspective of using powerful weapons to kill an “other?”
The word in Hebrew which is commonly translated as neighbor is "rei-acha." Not surprisingly, the meaning of the word "rei-acha" is not the word you would use to refer to your neighbors in Modern Hebrew. It is a word which you might use to refer to "the children of your people."
In a society like ours, who are the children of our people? Who are the people about whom we should concern ourselves?
Do we consider all Americans to be “our people?”
or
Do we only consider
people of similar religious backgrounds to be “our people?”
This is important because we must ask the Christian
fundamentalist community exactly who they are protecting themselves from?
I have heard more than one gun enthusiast say they are
protecting themselves against “the bad people.”
This to me seems to be the “NEW” meaning for the Golden
Rule. In other words, the fundamentalist Christian community is protecting
themselves from “OTHERS.”
Let’s read the Golden Rule one more time:
Do
unto others as you would have done unto you.
Kill
others as you would have wanted to be protected.
This doesn’t sound like good religious philosophy to me. It
sounds like a bunch of really scared people who are taking the law into their own
hands. It seems they are terrified that our violent culture will come for them next—that
we will reap as we have sown.
But
saying that G-d is on your side does not make it so.
And
making our culture more violent doesn’t solve anything.
So we must work together to get rid of the guns and to
search out the sources of violence in our society. We are all in this together.